Close

Articles Posted in Employment Discrimination

Updated:

New York City Council Amends New York City Human Rights Law to Protect Unpaid Interns from Discrimination and Harassment

Yesterday, the New York City Council voted unanimously to extend the protections of the New York City Human Rights Law to unpaid interns.  Now, interns will be protected from unlawful discrimination and harassment, like paid employees. The amendment defines an “intern” covered by the statute as “an individual who performs…

Updated:

Waivers and Releases In Exchange for Severance Pay May Violate Title VII

No law requires employers to offer employees severance pay upon termination.  Where an employer has a severance pay plan, however, the obligation to pay severance is triggered upon a qualifying event as defined by the plan, policy or contract at issue.  In most cases, employers will only pay severance in…

Updated:

Second Circuit States That Statute Of Limitations For State Tort Claims Are Not Tolled By Filing A Charge With The EEOC

Prior to filing a claim of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, a claimant is required to file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”).  Title…

Updated:

Do Confidentiality Provisions In Separation Agreements Violate Title VII? The EEOC Thinks So.

When providing a departing employees with severance pay, most employers require that the employee sign a separation or severance agreement, which, among other things, contains a general release of claims.  The payment of severance is given in exchange for the employee’s agreement not to raise any claims against the employer. …

Updated:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Releases Fiscal Year 2013 Enforcement and Litigation Results

On February 5, 2014, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) released its annual statistics on its FY 2013 activity.   Among other things, the data reveals that there was a 5.7% decrease in charges received by the agency in FY 2013 as compared to FY 2012.  In all, the EEOC received…

Updated:

U.S. Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Vacates Dismissal of Retaliation Claims Based Upon Employer’s Changing Reasons for Termination

A key aspect of an employer’s defense in an employment discrimination case involves the proffer of a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the adverse action claimed to be discriminatory by the employee.  While employers defending a discrimination case are not required to prove  that they acted legitimately, they are required to…

Updated:

New York City Amendment Providing Enhanced Protection to Pregnant Employees To Take Effect Soon

Recently, the New York City Council amended the New York City Human Rights Law to specifically require that a covered employer is specifically required to reasonably accommodate the pregnancy of an employee.  Although the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as New York state and New York City law already…

Updated:

Pantene Addresses Gender Equality in Life and the Workplace with Highly Effective Advertisement

Rarely do commercials instruct the public on anything more than the nature of the products they are pushing. From time to time, however, some advertisement campaigns go the extra mile to do good and contribute to the public’s recognition of society’s own prejudices and biases. Recently, Pantene Phillipines addressed the…

Updated:

Employment Non-Discrimination Act Being Considered in Congress

Following a Senate vote earlier this week on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), proponents are bracing themselves for a tough fight in the House of Representatives.  ENDA proposes to prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or identity in much the same way that Title VII of the…

Updated:

U.S. Supreme Court Adopts More Stringent Standard for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII

On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court decided University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, in which the Court held that claims of retaliation must be proved using a “but for” standard as opposed to the seemingly lower “motivating factor” standard of causation. The plaintiff had argued…